NO-JIRA: Use correct feature gate for InsightsDataGather #1137
Conversation
Use InsightsConfig instead of InsightsConfigAPI to match the actual feature gate that controls the InsightsDataGather resource. Signed-off-by: Ondrej Pokorny <[email protected]>
opokornyy
changed the title
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@opokornyy: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: opokornyy The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
|
@opokornyy: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Use InsightsConfig instead of InsightsConfigAPI to match the actual feature gate that controls the InsightsDataGather resource.
Categories
Sample Archive
NoneDocumentation
NoneUnit Tests
NonePrivacy
Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.
Changelog
NoneBreaking Changes
No
References
None