Skip to content

Documentation fix for #3779 #3785

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 22, 2023
Merged

Documentation fix for #3779 #3785

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
32ad4ba
documentation fix
Ashad001 Jun 19, 2023
e8e8997
Comment clean up
Ashad001 Jun 19, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion stl/inc/expected
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1423,7 +1423,6 @@ public:
}
}
constexpr void value() && {
// per LWG-3940
// TRANSITION, DevCom-1638273 and LLVM-53224
static_assert(is_copy_constructible_v<_Err>, "is_copy_constructible_v<E> must be true");
static_assert(is_move_constructible_v<_Err>, "is_move_constructible_v<E> must be true");
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ std/utilities/memory/specialized.algorithms/uninitialized.fill.n/ranges_uninitia
std/utilities/memory/specialized.algorithms/uninitialized.move/ranges_uninitialized_move.pass.cpp FAIL
std/utilities/memory/specialized.algorithms/uninitialized.move/ranges_uninitialized_move_n.pass.cpp FAIL

# libc++ doesn't speculatively implement LWG-3940
# libc++ doesn't implement LWG-3940
std/utilities/expected/expected.void/observers/value.pass.cpp FAIL

# libc++ doesn't implement P1957R2 "Converting from `T*` to `bool` should be considered narrowing"
Expand Down