Skip to content

Conversation

zhangzujian
Copy link
Member

Pull Request

What type of this PR

Examples of user facing changes:

  • Features
  • Bug fixes
  • Docs
  • Tests

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes #(issue-number)

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 9, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @zhangzujian, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug in the controller's initialization logic for OVN logical router options. It improves the robustness and idempotency of the option setting process by ensuring that existing options are preserved and that updates to the OVN Northbound database only occur when actual changes are needed.

Highlights

  • Logical Router Options Management: The pull request refactors how logical router (LR) options are set during controller initialization. Previously, a fixed set of options would unconditionally overwrite existing LR options. Now, the existing options are copied, specific required options (mac_binding_age_threshold, dynamic_neigh_routers) are applied, and the always_learn_from_arp_request: false option is no longer hardcoded during this initialization step.
  • Idempotency and Efficiency: A check has been added to compare the current logical router options with the desired options. The update to the OVN Northbound database is now only performed if there is a difference, making the initialization process more idempotent and preventing unnecessary API calls.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 9, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the initialization of logical router options to avoid overwriting existing settings. The new approach preserves existing options and only ensures specific ones are set, which is a good improvement. However, one of the previously set options, always_learn_from_arp_request, appears to have been missed in the refactoring. I've added a comment to address this potential issue.

Comment on lines +244 to +245
lrOptions["mac_binding_age_threshold"] = "300"
lrOptions["dynamic_neigh_routers"] = "true"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The previous implementation set the always_learn_from_arp_request option to "false", but this has been removed in the refactoring. Was this intentional?

If this option defaults to true, removing this could have security or stability implications by allowing the router to learn MAC addresses from unsolicited ARP requests. It seems this option should be preserved to maintain existing behavior.

	lrOptions["always_learn_from_arp_request"] = "false"
	lrOptions["mac_binding_age_threshold"] = "300"
	lrOptions["dynamic_neigh_routers"] = "true"

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why always_learn_from_arp_request is removed

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#5426

This option should not be set/changed during initialization.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16162770073

Details

  • 0 of 10 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.006%) to 21.386%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
pkg/controller/init.go 0 10 0.0%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
pkg/ovs/ovn-nb-bfd.go 2 61.61%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 16162428258: -0.006%
Covered Lines: 10511
Relevant Lines: 49149

💛 - Coveralls

@zhangzujian zhangzujian requested a review from changluyi July 9, 2025 07:20
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jul 14, 2025
@zhangzujian zhangzujian merged commit d7638b0 into kubeovn:master Jul 14, 2025
69 of 72 checks passed
@zhangzujian zhangzujian deleted the fix-lr-init branch July 14, 2025 06:45
zhangzujian added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2025
zhangzujian added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer need backport size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants