Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 18, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

jcorbin
Copy link
Contributor

@jcorbin jcorbin commented Oct 26, 2015

  • add new connectedServicePeers index
  • which lets us do a shorter fast path for refreshing an existing peer
  • setting the stage to later to more work in the "something actually changed" path, such as disconnecting from ex-affine peers per the prior TODO

r @Raynos @kriskowal

@jcorbin jcorbin force-pushed the affinity_change_vs_refresh branch from c6cbdcb to a0c0b44 Compare October 26, 2015 23:54
@jcorbin jcorbin changed the title WIP: Affinity change vs refresh Affinity change vs refresh Oct 26, 2015
@jcorbin
Copy link
Contributor Author

jcorbin commented Oct 26, 2015

Disentangled from #90, since its in test-break hell.

@jcorbin jcorbin force-pushed the affinity_change_vs_refresh branch from a0c0b44 to 1a2b2cc Compare October 27, 2015 00:07
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO use reason

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed, it's here to be used by a future peer.drain such as #90

@Raynos
Copy link
Contributor

Raynos commented Oct 27, 2015

Reviewed things on commits.

@kriskowal
Copy link
Contributor

🆗

@Raynos
Copy link
Contributor

Raynos commented Oct 27, 2015

lgtm.

jcorbin added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2015
@jcorbin jcorbin merged commit c3fb687 into master Oct 27, 2015
@jcorbin jcorbin deleted the affinity_change_vs_refresh branch October 27, 2015 00:47
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants