Skip to content

Conversation

hborla
Copy link
Member

@hborla hborla commented Aug 19, 2025

This change introduces a section on global-actor isolated protocol conformances, which were introduced in SE-0470.

Fixes: rdar://148361008

@hborla hborla changed the title [SE-0470] Add a section on isolated conformances to the Concurrency chapter of the language guide. Add a section on isolated conformances to the Concurrency chapter of the language guide. [SE-0470] Aug 19, 2025
This change adds a section on global-actor isolated
protocol conformances to the Concurrency chapter of
the language guide.
@amartini51 amartini51 changed the title Add a section on isolated conformances to the Concurrency chapter of the language guide. [SE-0470] Add a section on isolated conformances to the guide [SE-0470] Aug 19, 2025
Copy link
Member

@DougGregor DougGregor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for writing this!

amartini51 and others added 8 commits August 19, 2025 10:51
Use semantic line breaks for prose, title case for headings, four spaces
for Swift code indentation, and contractions.
Replace a few uses of "called" with "used" when
talking about using protocol requirements. Also
removed the subheadings in the Using Isolated
Conformances section.
Isolated conformance inference is gated behing the
InferIsolatedConformances upcoming feature. Add a dedicated
section for inference and a note about the upcoming
feature identifier per the guidance in Style.md.
Copy link
Contributor

@ktoso ktoso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! Had some clarification ideas you may want to take, commented inline

@hborla hborla force-pushed the se-0470 branch 2 times, most recently from 88db53c to d657461 Compare September 6, 2025 01:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants