Skip to content

[DOC] Make sure we are clear about th PKCS#8 certificate format requirement #11784

@scholzj

Description

@scholzj

As discussed in https://github.com/orgs/strimzi/discussions/11751#discussioncomment-14243883, it seems that after the move from PKCS12 to PEM certificate stores, we require the certificate to be in the PKCS#8 format (while iot seems that while the intentional support was originally for PKCS#8, we through OpenSSL supported PKCS#1 as well).

We should make sure this is clearly documented in the docs. In the long term, this should apply to the user certificates in Connect/MM2/Bridge ... but likely also to CAs and custom listener server certificates.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions