wordpress-on-lamp.md #2567
Merged
wordpress-on-lamp.md #2567
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Grammar Check
sspencerwire
reviewed
Jan 9, 2025
| @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ tested_with: 9.2 | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Introduction | |||
|
|
|||
| WordPress is an open source content management system (CMS) noted for its [famous 5 minute install](https://developer.wordpress.org/advanced-administration/before-install/howto-install/). It is commonly deployed on a LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) stack. Although efficient local development tools such as [XAMPP](https://www.apachefriends.org/), [Vagrant](https://www.vagrantup.com/), and [wp-env](https://developer.wordpress.org/block-editor/reference-guides/packages/packages-env/) are widely available, manually installing WordPress on LAMP for local development provides a valuable hands-on approach for beginners seeking greater understanding. | |||
| WordPress is an open-source content management system (CMS) noted for its [famous 5-minute install](https://developer.wordpress.org/advanced-administration/before-install/howto-install/). It is commonly deployed on a LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) stack. Although efficient local development tools such as [XAMPP](https://www.apachefriends.org/), [Vagrant](https://www.vagrantup.com/), and [wp-env](https://developer.wordpress.org/block-editor/reference-guides/packages/packages-env/) are widely available, manually installing WordPress on LAMP for local development provides a valuable hands-on approach for beginners seeking greater understanding. | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, @gannazhyrnova, I think it is correct without the hyphen:
"open source" (without a hyphen) when referring to the concept as a whole, and "open-source" (with a hyphen) when used as an adjective before a noun, like "open-source software."
There's another rule out there that I've read that says to Never use it as an adjective. Thoughts?
revert open-source back to open source
sspencerwire
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2025
Test results for 309791a:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Grammar Check
Author checklist (Completed by original Author)
Rocky Documentation checklist (Completed by Rocky team)