Skip to content

Conversation

bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/assign @kevinrizza

hack/update-kube-vendor.sh 72a1beec012d2552d27d250025c832d7794a7cf1 github.com/openshift/kubernetes
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61333, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60507 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/assign @kevinrizza

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and p0lyn0mial September 9, 2025 13:49
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 9, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the e2e-images-update Related to images used by e2e tests label Sep 9, 2025
@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61333, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60507 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61333, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60507 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61333, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60507 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61333, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60507 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bertinatto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61333, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60507 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/remove-label jira/invalid-bug
/label jira/valid-bug

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@bertinatto: Can not set label jira/valid-bug: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers openshift-staff-engineers openshift-release-oversight openshift-sustaining-engineers]

In response to this:

/remove-label jira/invalid-bug
/label jira/valid-bug

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@bertinatto: The label(s) /remove-label jira/invalid-bug cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, ok-to-test, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/remove-label jira/invalid-bug
/label jira/valid-bug

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/verified bypass

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kevinrizza: The verified label has been added.

In response to this:

/lgtm
/verified bypass

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, kevinrizza

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@sdodson sdodson added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 550fed1 and 2 for PR HEAD 591a841 in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2025

@bertinatto: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia 591a841 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade 591a841 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2 591a841 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 591a841 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 591a841 link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway 591a841 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 550fed1 and 2 for PR HEAD 591a841 in total

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. e2e-images-update Related to images used by e2e tests jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants