Skip to content

Conversation

sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

@sjenning sjenning commented Oct 2, 2017

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 2, 2017
@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjenning commented Oct 2, 2017

/test integration

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjenning commented Oct 3, 2017

@smarterclayton @derekwaynecarr this is all green now and merged upstream. Can I get review/lgtm?

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 3, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sjenning, smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 3, 2017
@sjenning sjenning added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Oct 3, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit afd90cd into openshift:master Oct 3, 2017
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 4, 2017

@smarterclayton @derekwaynecarr this is all green now and merged upstream. Can I get review/lgtm?

We specifically requested upstreams be held while we rebased. The rebase was green and this is forcing a re-pick or re-bump.

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjenning commented Oct 4, 2017

@deads2k didn't know this was a thing. Where/when did the UPSTREAM hold get communicated? Also, #16664 is the queue. Sorry.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Oct 4, 2017

@sjenning email from Oct 2nd titled 'Holding upstream commit until rebase lands'.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Oct 4, 2017

@deads2k didn't know this was a thing. Where/when did the UPSTREAM hold get communicated? Also, #16664 is the queue. Sorry.

tagged that one do-not-merge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants