Skip to content

Conversation

rhamilto
Copy link
Member

@rhamilto rhamilto commented Feb 27, 2018

Also fixes #2614 by eliminating the three column layout for desktop resolutions
screen shot 2018-02-28 at 10 24 44 am

And updates volume-claim-template heading to the new style
Before:
screen shot 2018-02-28 at 9 45 29 am
After:
screen shot 2018-02-28 at 9 45 35 am

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 27, 2018
@rhamilto rhamilto added this to the 3.10.0 milestone Feb 27, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 27, 2018
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/assign @sg00dwin

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

@TheRealJon FYI, this removes the layout.attrs dependency (which was bower only)

@@ -35,12 +35,9 @@
margin-top: 15px;
}
.pod-template {
// so that .word-break() on children works
[flex] {
min-width: 0;
Copy link
Member

@sg00dwin sg00dwin Feb 28, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wouldn't we need to keep min-width: 0 on .pod-template?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep. It moved to line 53.

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
</div>
<div class="pipeline">
<div class="pipeline-stage" ng-repeat="stage in jenkinsStatus.stages track by stage.id">
<div column class="pipeline-stage-column">
<div class="pipeline-stage-column">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't there be a .pipeline-stage-column rule with flex-direction:column; display:flex since it was removed from the markup?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be completely parallel with what was there, yes. But a div displays block by default, and that renders the same way as flex/column, so I opted to remove it for less code.

@rhamilto rhamilto changed the title [WIP] Removing layout.attrs to reduce dependencies Removing layout.attrs to reduce dependencies Mar 1, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 1, 2018
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented Mar 1, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 1, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit dd7f1a0 into openshift:master Mar 1, 2018
@rhamilto rhamilto deleted the remove-layout.attrs branch March 1, 2018 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Membership Add Role cannot see dropdown contents
5 participants