Skip to content

Conversation

trask
Copy link
Member

@trask trask commented Sep 2, 2025

Related

Pros:

  • Value maps are more performant than in Prototype: Complex attributes (Option B) #7661
  • Reuses existing (and familiar) Attributes
  • Only exposes less performant and more complex Value API for heterogeneous maps, which are not expected to be common

Cons:

  • Mixes concept of attributes and nested maps

@trask trask force-pushed the complex-attrs branch 5 times, most recently from 1a6d02e to f66919d Compare September 16, 2025 19:08
@trask trask changed the title Prototype: Complex attributes Prototype: Complex attributes (Option A) Sep 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant