Comment out pmsleep and timer_suspend options in user_config.h

[dnc40085]

• This PR is for the dev branch rather than for master.
• This PR is compliant with the other contributing guidelines as well (if not, please describe why).
• I have thoroughly tested my contribution.

This PR comments out ENABLE_TIMER_SUSPEND and PMSLEEP_ENABLE in user_config.h.
These features currently have some issues that will take some time to resolve and to prevent further delay of the master drop, the features have been disabled in user_config.h

[TerryE]

Oops, it looks as is we've missed some conditionals around calling the swTimer routines in tmr.c

[dnc40085]

@TerryE that's weird, it compiled fine locally for both float and integer versions

[marcelstoer]

Doesn't this effectively render the improvements you made in 0844a5d moot and break backwards compatibility?

[TerryE]

What this does is to make the pmSleep functionality disabled by default. Any developer that wants it only needs to uncomment the two #define statements. This a quick change that can be incorporated in the dev->master drop that you deferred.

The last dev->master drop slipped in some fundamental changes to how our timer work. This was a mistake, IMO; if making these changes configurable but at least not enabled by default to correct this mistake is a break in backwards compatibility, then it's the sort of break that we should still be doing.

[marcelstoer]

I wasn't trying to suggest this be changed somehow but trying to verify my assessment of the impact. To conclude:

• We're all good for the master drop.
• It really seems pointless for a function to print "this was removed" when the function isn't even compiled in. Not that this couldn't be solved if desired...

[marcelstoer]

In hind sight, why didn't it occur to us that this change should be reflected in the tmr documentation? scratching my head...

[melstav]

As someone who recently wasted a not insignificant amount of time trying to figure out why calls to node.sleep kept erroring out, I have to say that I concur with the previous comment.