Skip to content

tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1 #50380

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1 #50380

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

targos
Copy link
Member

@targos targos commented Oct 25, 2023

No description provided.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/gyp

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. gyp Issues and PRs related to the GYP tool and .gyp build files needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory. labels Oct 25, 2023
@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Oct 25, 2023

@nodejs/python not sure what to do about https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/6636731539/job/18029693061

@gengjiawen
Copy link
Member

@nodejs/python not sure what to do about nodejs/node/actions/runs/6636731539/job/18029693061

ignore tools/gyp should do.

node/pyproject.toml

Line 23 in d1ccca9

"tools/node_modules",

@targos targos added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Oct 25, 2023
@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Oct 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I would comment out this line in tools/gyp/pyproject.toml
error: TOML parse error at line 94, column 3
|
94 | "PLR1714",
| ^^^^^^^^^
Unknown rule selector: PLR1714

@gengjiawen
Copy link
Member

I would comment out this line: error: TOML parse error at line 94, column 3 | 94 | "PLR1714", | ^^^^^^^^^ Unknown rule selector: PLR1714

In the long run, we shouldn't lint and format deps in Node.js repo. This can be done in gyp-next.

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Oct 25, 2023

Oh... This is because we are using a pinned version of ruff and gyp-next is using a current one.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Oct 25, 2023
@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Oct 25, 2023

Please update

node/Makefile

Lines 1499 to 1500 in d1ccca9

$(PYTHON) -m pip install --upgrade --target tools/pip/site-packages ruff==0.0.272 || \
$(PYTHON) -m pip install --upgrade --system --target tools/pip/site-packages ruff==0.0.272

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/55218/

@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Oct 25, 2023

This should not be related. gyp-next is linted in its own project and I agree with @gengjiawen we should not lint it again with our own rules here.

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Oct 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Ruff is designed to work in complex monorepos so we would not be testing the node-gyp directory using this repo’s pyproject.toml (as this error proves). Ruff parsed this file because it will be the settings used to lint that directory.

@anonrig anonrig added commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. commit-queue-rebase Add this label to allow the Commit Queue to land a PR in several commits. labels Oct 31, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Oct 31, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in a77ef54...6557c1c

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2023
@targos @nodejs-github-bot
tools: skip ruff on tools/gyp
76d4e38 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2023
@targos @nodejs-github-bot
tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1
6557c1c 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@targos targos deleted the update-gyp branch October 31, 2023 12:45
alexfernandez pushed a commit to alexfernandez/node that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
@targos @alexfernandez
tools: skip ruff on tools/gyp
c0c3a8c 
PR-URL: nodejs#50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
alexfernandez pushed a commit to alexfernandez/node that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
@targos @alexfernandez
tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1
5c24551 
PR-URL: nodejs#50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
This was referenced Nov 6, 2023
Merged
Merged
anonrig pushed a commit to anonrig/node that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2023
@targos @anonrig
tools: skip ruff on tools/gyp
e23d836 
PR-URL: nodejs#50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
anonrig pushed a commit to anonrig/node that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2023
@targos @anonrig
tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1
7478b77 
PR-URL: nodejs#50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2023
@targos
tools: skip ruff on tools/gyp
de9dc10 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2023
@targos
tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1
171ae59 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2023
Merged
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2023
@targos
tools: skip ruff on tools/gyp
9fc29c9 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2023
@targos
tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1
52e7b6d 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@targos targos added lts-watch-v18.x lts-watch-v20.x PRs that may need to be released in v20.x labels Nov 15, 2023
UlisesGascon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2023
@targos @UlisesGascon
tools: skip ruff on tools/gyp
f5ccab5 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
UlisesGascon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2023
@targos @UlisesGascon
tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1
22b7a74 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2023
Merged
@richardlau richardlau mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2024
Merged
@richardlau richardlau added backported-to-v20.x PRs backported to the v20.x-staging branch. and removed lts-watch-v20.x PRs that may need to be released in v20.x labels Mar 25, 2024
joshuafried pushed a commit to joshuafried/node that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
@targos @joshuafried
tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1
eb4420d 
PR-URL: nodejs/node#50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2024
@targos @aduh95
tools: skip ruff on tools/gyp
fa72b2c 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2024
@targos @aduh95
tools: update gyp-next to v0.16.1
0fb652e 
PR-URL: #50380
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@aduh95 aduh95 mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

@anonrig anonrig anonrig approved these changes

@gengjiawen gengjiawen gengjiawen approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backported-to-v20.x PRs backported to the v20.x-staging branch. build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. commit-queue-rebase Add this label to allow the Commit Queue to land a PR in several commits. gyp Issues and PRs related to the GYP tool and .gyp build files needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@targos @nodejs-github-bot @gengjiawen @cclauss @jasnell @anonrig @richardlau @aduh95