feat: specific error for socket permission #1149
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As discussed here: #1054 If socket is not readable, for example when protected with SELinux and/or run as a rootless user, the existing error is deceptive. An additional error to check that it is readable before checking if it is a socket will clarify the problem. SELinux tip included for good measure.
buchdag
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2024
buchdag
changed the title
|
Thanks @JohnMertz |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed here: #1054
If socket is not readable, for example when protected with SELinux and/or run as a rootless user, the existing error is deceptive. An additional error to check that it is readable before checking if it is a socket will clarify the problem. SELinux tip included for good measure.