Skip to content

Conversation

mohamedawnallah
Copy link
Contributor

Change Description

Description of change / link to associated issue.

Steps to Test

Steps for reviewers to follow to test the change.

Pull Request Checklist

Testing

  • Your PR passes all CI checks.
  • Tests covering the positive and negative (error paths) are included.
  • Bug fixes contain tests triggering the bug to prevent regressions.

Code Style and Documentation

📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @mohamedawnallah, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to drastically reduce the size of the LND linter Docker image. This is achieved by migrating to an Alpine-based Go image and optimizing the build process within the Dockerfile, complemented by corresponding adjustments in the Makefile for cache handling. The primary impact is a more efficient CI/CD pipeline due to smaller image downloads and reduced storage requirements.

Highlights

  • Significant Image Size Reduction: Reduced the LND linter Docker image size by 85%, from 2330 MB to 355 MB, leading to faster downloads and reduced storage.
  • Base Image Migration: Switched the tools/Dockerfile base image from the larger golang:1.24.6 to the more lightweight golang:1.24.6-alpine.
  • Build Process Optimization: Implemented apk for package installation and added post-build cleanup steps in the Dockerfile to remove build caches and temporary files, further minimizing the final image size.
  • Makefile Cache Alignment: Updated the Makefile to align Docker volume mounts for Go build caches with the new Dockerfile structure, and removed the explicit GOMODCACHE mount.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request significantly reduces the LND linter docker image size by switching to an Alpine base image and implementing multi-stage build-like optimizations within a single RUN command to clean up build dependencies and caches. The changes are well-executed and effective. I have one minor suggestion for the tools/Dockerfile to further optimize the image size by handling the apk cache more efficiently. The related changes in the Makefile are correct and align with the new Docker image structure.


COPY . /tmp/tools
RUN apk update && apk add --no-cache git

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this change correctly switches to apk for the Alpine base image, there's a small improvement to further reduce the image size. The apk update command creates a cache in /var/cache/apk/. In your later RUN command on line 17, you remove this cache with rm -rf /var/cache/apk/*.

However, because the removal happens in a different RUN instruction (and thus a different Docker layer), the cache files from this layer will still be part of the image, even though they are marked as deleted in a later layer.

To avoid this and make the image even smaller, you should perform the cleanup in the same RUN instruction. After applying the suggestion below, you can remove the rm -rf /var/cache/apk/* from the RUN command on lines 11-18.

RUN apk update && apk add --no-cache git && rm -rf /var/cache/apk/*

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant