Add new targets test-fast and test-slow

[ray6080]

Description

To avoid waiting for some long-running tests locally, this PR starts to add an initial separation of fast and slow tests, which is done by appending a "_SLOW" suffix at the end of test case name.

There can be other more sophisticated mechanisms to separate the fast and slow test cases, but I feel it's unnecessarily complicated vs. simply use the test case suffix, which still allows us to organize tests accordingly to their functionality and is more flexible.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 63.55%. Comparing base (bcbfabd) to head (3fea517).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
test/transaction/checkpoint_test.cpp	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
test/transaction/transaction_test.cpp	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
test/copy/copy_test.cpp	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
test/copy/multi_copy_test.cpp	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
test/storage/node_update_test.cpp	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (63.55%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (bcbfabd) and HEAD (3fea517). Click for more details.

HEAD has 3 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (bcbfabd)	HEAD (3fea517)
on-disk	1	0
in-mem	1	0
recovery	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5995       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   85.77%   63.55%   -22.22%     
===========================================
  Files        1642     1642               
  Lines       75827    75768       -59     
  Branches     9023     8819      -204     
===========================================
- Hits        65037    48157    -16880     
- Misses      10529    27477    +16948     
+ Partials      261      134      -127     

Flag	Coverage Δ
extension	63.55% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
in-mem	?
on-disk	?
recovery	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark Result

Master commit hash: 12569744b4958f53c7ce02f31f96afbea8464b0e
Branch commit hash: 663ee12ba98ed698bd4b4a40a6e196b879880352

No major diffs!

Other queries

Query Group	Query Name	Mean Time - Commit (ms)
aggregation	q24	717.26
aggregation	q28	7716.29
filter	q14	60.68
filter	q15	63.05
filter	q16	283.03
filter	q17	388.59
filter	q18	1862.56
filter	zonemap-node	24.76
filter	zonemap-node-lhs-cast	25.73
filter	zonemap-node-null	24.95
filter	zonemap-rel	5619.46
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q07	630.87
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q08	917.05
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q09	920.99
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q10	193.53
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q11	194.03
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q12	170.96
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q13	1518.63
fixed_size_seq_scan	q23	44.99
join	q29	725.80
join	q30	1768.10
join	q31	4.17
join	SelectiveTwoHopJoin	46.82
ldbc_snb_ic	q35	9.54
ldbc_snb_ic	q36	97.50
ldbc_snb_is	q32	5.39
ldbc_snb_is	q33	12.15
ldbc_snb_is	q34	1.22
limit	push-down-limit-into-distinct	1946.13
multi-rel	multi-rel-large-scan	1627.56
multi-rel	multi-rel-lookup	7.03
multi-rel	multi-rel-small-scan	190.22
order_by	q25	65.87
order_by	q26	383.36
order_by	q27	1318.05
recursive_join	recursive-join-bidirection	344.71
recursive_join	recursive-join-dense	7100.70
recursive_join	recursive-join-path	23431.97
recursive_join	recursive-join-sparse	10.97
recursive_join	recursive-join-trail	7082.18
scan_after_filter	q01	106.98
scan_after_filter	q02	94.41
shortest_path_ldbc100	q37	151.31
shortest_path_ldbc100	q38	351.63
shortest_path_ldbc100	q39	88.27
shortest_path_ldbc100	q40	518.41
var_size_expr_evaluator	q03	2137.65
var_size_expr_evaluator	q04	2199.66
var_size_expr_evaluator	q05	2616.65
var_size_expr_evaluator	q06	1297.04
var_size_seq_scan	q19	1371.59
var_size_seq_scan	q20	2659.60
var_size_seq_scan	q21	2179.80
var_size_seq_scan	q22	109.93