Fix LSQB benchmark runs

[ray6080]

Description

The LSQB benchmark failed due to the change of single file database. Not we need to pass in a file path instead of a directory to construct a Kuzu Database.

[sdht0]

nit: can we use db.kuzu instead (or <something>.kuzu?

[ray6080]

sure.

[github-actions]

Benchmark Result

Master commit hash: 6f593302aa546ba6507dd022214143a8e89f5b10
Branch commit hash: 1c851bf61feea2a22c7b67358503d9fa648bb944

Query Group	Query Name	Mean Time - Commit (ms)	Mean Time - Master (ms)	Diff
join	SelectiveTwoHopJoin	45.32	57.88	-12.55 (-21.69%)
ldbc_snb_is	q33	14.03	10.99	3.04 (27.62%)
multi-rel	multi-rel-small-scan	156.14	210.35	-54.22 (-25.77%)

Other queries

Query Group	Query Name	Mean Time - Commit (ms)	Mean Time - Master (ms)	Diff
aggregation	q24	703.54	703.73	-0.19 (-0.03%)
aggregation	q28	7755.86	7737.82	18.03 (0.23%)
filter	q14	59.31	60.53	-1.22 (-2.02%)
filter	q15	61.92	61.01	0.91 (1.49%)
filter	q16	273.37	273.50	-0.13 (-0.05%)
filter	q17	379.80	382.35	-2.55 (-0.67%)
filter	q18	1814.02	1817.13	-3.11 (-0.17%)
filter	zonemap-node	23.90	23.57	0.33 (1.39%)
filter	zonemap-node-lhs-cast	23.91	23.57	0.34 (1.44%)
filter	zonemap-node-null	23.58	23.23	0.35 (1.51%)
filter	zonemap-rel	5173.15	5265.82	-92.68 (-1.76%)
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q07	627.51	627.05	0.46 (0.07%)
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q08	914.99	915.65	-0.65 (-0.07%)
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q09	915.18	914.93	0.25 (0.03%)
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q10	198.45	198.65	-0.21 (-0.11%)
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q11	198.98	197.16	1.82 (0.92%)
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q12	176.11	176.26	-0.16 (-0.09%)
fixed_size_expr_evaluator	q13	1497.51	1500.82	-3.31 (-0.22%)
fixed_size_seq_scan	q23	52.99	56.24	-3.24 (-5.77%)
join	q29	784.10	750.88	33.22 (4.42%)
join	q30	1835.86	1784.95	50.91 (2.85%)
join	q31	4.59	5.74	-1.14 (-19.92%)
ldbc_snb_ic	q35	9.84	9.88	-0.04 (-0.45%)
ldbc_snb_ic	q36	96.22	95.22	1.00 (1.05%)
ldbc_snb_is	q32	2.93	2.59	0.35 (13.39%)
ldbc_snb_is	q34	1.21	1.27	-0.06 (-4.41%)
limit	push-down-limit-into-distinct	2036.04	2003.86	32.18 (1.61%)
multi-rel	multi-rel-large-scan	1420.32	1450.23	-29.91 (-2.06%)
multi-rel	multi-rel-lookup	5.90	5.32	0.58 (10.87%)
order_by	q25	65.22	68.91	-3.69 (-5.35%)
order_by	q26	383.75	386.32	-2.56 (-0.66%)
order_by	q27	1302.98	1296.90	6.08 (0.47%)
recursive_join	recursive-join-bidirection	375.52	390.83	-15.30 (-3.92%)
recursive_join	recursive-join-dense	7110.93	7079.77	31.15 (0.44%)
recursive_join	recursive-join-path	23345.31	23376.05	-30.74 (-0.13%)
recursive_join	recursive-join-sparse	9.74	10.88	-1.14 (-10.46%)
recursive_join	recursive-join-trail	7084.40	7037.67	46.73 (0.66%)
scan_after_filter	q01	115.77	112.52	3.25 (2.89%)
scan_after_filter	q02	96.26	90.44	5.81 (6.43%)
shortest_path_ldbc100	q37	79.89	80.33	-0.44 (-0.54%)
shortest_path_ldbc100	q38	348.98	359.33	-10.35 (-2.88%)
shortest_path_ldbc100	q39	81.04	89.56	-8.52 (-9.51%)
shortest_path_ldbc100	q40	530.99	541.12	-10.13 (-1.87%)
var_size_expr_evaluator	q03	2122.80	2119.37	3.44 (0.16%)
var_size_expr_evaluator	q04	2104.79	2114.85	-10.06 (-0.48%)
var_size_expr_evaluator	q05	2613.12	2601.30	11.82 (0.45%)
var_size_expr_evaluator	q06	1260.66	1264.62	-3.96 (-0.31%)
var_size_seq_scan	q19	1353.61	1346.35	7.26 (0.54%)
var_size_seq_scan	q20	2236.04	2236.36	-0.32 (-0.01%)
var_size_seq_scan	q21	2168.47	2176.48	-8.00 (-0.37%)
var_size_seq_scan	q22	110.87	110.05	0.82 (0.75%)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.95%. Comparing base (6f59330) to head (4919723).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5820      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.95%   85.95%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1620     1620              
  Lines       73587    73587              
  Branches     8803     8803              
==========================================
- Hits        63253    63251       -2     
- Misses      10109    10111       +2     
  Partials      225      225              

Flag	Coverage Δ
extension	63.35% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
in-mem	81.68% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
on-disk	86.55% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
recovery	86.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.