SIG scalability leadership change

[shyamjvs]

Following up on earlier conversation with other leads, I'm nominating @mengqiy as the new SIG co-chair in my stead as I step to SIG lead role. David has been instrumental in making several improvements to our testbed and is actively helping triage issues with scalability job health. He's also a regular participant in our bi-weekly community meetings and brings up interesting issues for discussion (xref).

/cc @wojtek-t @marseel - I'll wait for your consensus

[shyamjvs]

Think I manually edited an autogen file - fixed it now and verify should pass.

[wojtek-t]

+1

I'll wait for a week and tag after that.

[mengqiy]

Thanks @shyamjvs for recognition and nomination!

[marseel]

+1

Thanks @shyamjvs and @mengqiy

[wojtek-t]

@shyamjvs - can you please rebase?

[shyamjvs]

Done!

[wojtek-t]

/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel

[wojtek-t]

/assign @soltysh

Can you please approve?

[shyamjvs]

In case @soltysh isn't available, @BenTheElder @aojea - could one of you approve instead?

[soltysh]

In case @soltysh isn't available, @BenTheElder @aojea - could one of you approve instead?

I'm back so
/approve

but I have 2 questions:

1. can you open an issue (there's a Leadership Change template for that), which will help you track all the necessary changes
2. can you link me a ML thread where this was announced?

/hold
to get these 2 resolved

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: shyamjvs, soltysh, wojtek-t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [soltysh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shyamjvs]

Sorry I missed this part of the process. Opened the github issue (will own the tasks there along with @mengqiy) - #8370. We don't have an ML thread (can send one if needed), but we discussed it as part recent SIG meeting on 27th Feb (notes).

[soltysh]

Sorry I missed this part of the process. Opened the github issue (will own the tasks there along with @mengqiy) - #8370. We don't have an ML thread (can send one if needed), but we discussed it as part recent SIG meeting on 27th Feb (notes).

Thanks for opening that issue 😄
For future, it's good practice to also announce on ML, but since you've announced this during public call and it was broadly aware, I'm ok as is.

/hold cancel