Skip to content

Conversation

robscott
Copy link
Member

@robscott robscott commented Aug 12, 2021

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
This implements and documents GEP #746.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #746

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

* Certificate refs from Gateways can now cross namespaces (with ReferencePolicy)
* Certificate refs no longer exist on HTTPRoute

Note: The CRD verification will fail on this PR until #754 gets in.

Deploy Preview: https://deploy-preview-768--kubernetes-sigs-gateway-api.netlify.app/v1alpha2/guides/tls/

/cc @hbagdi @howardjohn @jpeach @Miciah @youngnick

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from jpeach August 12, 2021 00:40
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 12, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@robscott: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: Miciah, howardjohn.

Note that only kubernetes-sigs members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
This implements and documents GEP #746.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #746

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

* Certificate refs from Gateways can now cross namespaces (with ReferencePolicy)
* Certificate refs no longer exist on HTTPRoute

Note: The CRD verification will fail on this PR until #754 gets in.

/cc @hbagdi @howardjohn @jpeach @Miciah @youngnick

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 12, 2021
@robscott robscott added this to the v1alpha2 milestone Aug 12, 2021
@robscott robscott force-pushed the gep-746-implementation branch 3 times, most recently from cf0a14d to c283af9 Compare August 12, 2021 00:47
@bowei
Copy link
Contributor

bowei commented Aug 12, 2021

/hold
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 12, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 12, 2021
@robscott robscott force-pushed the gep-746-implementation branch from c283af9 to d21a3a6 Compare August 12, 2021 16:55
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 12, 2021
@robscott robscott force-pushed the gep-746-implementation branch from d21a3a6 to a6f1fa8 Compare August 12, 2021 17:10
@robscott
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the feedback @bowei! I think I've updated everything, PTAL.

Copy link
Contributor

@jpeach jpeach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

tls:
certificateRef:
kind: Secret
group: ""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

consider omitting group since the default is "core"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know we once had a default here, but it looks like we've removed it in favor of a generic ObjectRef, so I think this still needs to be specified.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jpeach, robscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 13, 2021
@robscott
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c2fa25e into kubernetes-sigs:master Aug 13, 2021
@robscott robscott deleted the gep-746-implementation branch January 8, 2022 01:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GEP: Replace Certificate Refs on HTTPRoute with Cross Namespace Refs from Gateway
4 participants