-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
📖 [WIP] Add proposal for independent worker topology versions #12698
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Igor Velichkovich <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alejandro Escobar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Cody W. Eilar <[email protected]>
The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Welcome @AcidLeroy! |
Hi @AcidLeroy. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
for issue: #12466 |
lets mark as draft until we have some consensus on the google doc |
What this PR does / why we need it:
The purpose of this PR is to add "independent worker topology versions" to ClusterClass. This allows cluster vendors to continue to utilize ClusterClass, but enables them to have more fine-grained control over the K8s versions running in their worker node groups.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Fixes #12466
/area clusterclass