-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 489
fix parsing resolv.conf when systemd-resolved is running on the host #5423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: zhangzujian <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @zhangzujian, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request resolves a critical issue preventing the application from correctly reading /etc/resolv.conf
when systemd-resolved
is active on the host, which was causing errors in DNS search metric collection. The changes ensure the correct configuration file is always targeted and refine the domain filtering logic for these metrics.
Highlights
- DNS Resolution Fix: I've addressed a bug where the application failed to correctly parse
/etc/resolv.conf
on hosts runningsystemd-resolved
. Previously,resolvconf.Get()
could incorrectly resolve to/run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf
within a container, leading to a 'no such file or directory' error. This change explicitly tells the resolver to read/etc/resolv.conf
directly, ensuring proper DNS search metric collection. - DNS Search Metric Logic Refinement: I've updated the logic for filtering domains when collecting DNS search metrics. Instead of ignoring domains containing 'local', the system now specifically ignores the root domain
.
(dot), which is a more precise and correct way to handle such entries in the search list.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes two bugs in the DNS search domain metric collection. First, it changes how resolv.conf
is read to avoid errors on systems using systemd-resolved
. Second, it corrects the logic for filtering search domains. The changes are correct and improve the robustness of the metric collection. I've added one comment suggesting a further improvement to handle the metric lifecycle correctly, to avoid stale metrics when search domains are removed.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16043382967Details
💛 - Coveralls |
…ubeovn#5423) Signed-off-by: zhangzujian <[email protected]>
…5423) Signed-off-by: zhangzujian <[email protected]>
…ubeovn#5423) Signed-off-by: zhangzujian <[email protected]>
Pull Request
What type of this PR
Examples of user facing changes:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes