Skip to content

Bump y-py to 0.6.0+ #175

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2023
Merged

Bump y-py to 0.6.0+ #175

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2023

Conversation

fcollonval
Copy link
Member

Reference

Fixes jupyterlab/jupyterlab#14764

Changes

  • Bump y-py to ~0.6.0

  • Wrap to_json with json.loads

  • Add license header on Python files

@fcollonval fcollonval added this to the 0.2.x milestone Jul 17, 2023
@fcollonval fcollonval marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2023 15:15
@fcollonval fcollonval requested a review from davidbrochart July 17, 2023 15:16
@fcollonval
Copy link
Member Author

Cancelled job are passing (some stuff about handling coroutines preventing the process to finish)
Doc is not set up for this branch; so we can ignore the job.

hbcarlos
hbcarlos approved these changes Jul 17, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@hbcarlos hbcarlos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @fcollonval

@hbcarlos hbcarlos merged commit e441c6e into jupyter-server:0.2.x Jul 17, 2023
@fcollonval fcollonval deleted the maintenance/bump-ypy branch July 18, 2023 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@davidbrochart davidbrochart Awaiting requested review from davidbrochart

1 more reviewer

@hbcarlos hbcarlos hbcarlos approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
maintenance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.2.x
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@fcollonval @hbcarlos