Skip to content

Conversation

G-Rath
Copy link
Collaborator

@G-Rath G-Rath commented Jan 16, 2025

We can do this now that we're not supporting Node v14

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 16, 2025
@G-Rath G-Rath removed the bug Something isn't working label Jan 16, 2025
@G-Rath G-Rath merged commit 3815685 into next Jan 16, 2025
28 checks passed
@G-Rath G-Rath deleted the upgrade-typescript-eslint2 branch January 16, 2025 22:39
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
# [3.0.0-next.3](v3.0.0-next.2...v3.0.0-next.3) (2025-01-16)

### Features

* upgrade `@typescript-eslint/utils` to v6 ([#238](#238)) ([3815685](3815685))
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.0-next.3 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

G-Rath added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
* feat: upgrade `@typescript-eslint/utils` to v6

* fix: remove `recommended` and `category` meta properties

* fix: replace declaration merging with a type cast for now

* fix: update `context` usages
G-Rath pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
# [3.0.0-next.3](v3.0.0-next.2...v3.0.0-next.3) (2025-01-16)

### Features

* upgrade `@typescript-eslint/utils` to v6 ([#238](#238)) ([3815685](3815685))
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
# [3.0.0](v2.4.0...v3.0.0) (2025-01-17)

### Features

* adjust Node constraints to match `eslint-plugin-jest` ([#235](#235)) ([6d2414a](6d2414a))
* drop support for Node v14 ([#232](#232)) ([fef65e0](fef65e0))
* support `@typescript-eslint/utils` v7 & v8 ([#241](#241)) ([40766b0](40766b0))
* upgrade `@typescript-eslint/utils` to v6 ([#238](#238)) ([657bc42](657bc42))

### BREAKING CHANGES

* Versions of Node v18 up to 18.11.x are no longer supported
* drop support for Node v14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant