Skip to content

Conversation

gaby
Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby commented Jul 31, 2025

Summary

  • clarify that wildcard origins cannot be used with credentials
  • use slice in subdomain example
  • fix ExposeHeaders type in table
  • correct Vary header description

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 31, 2025 01:35
@gaby gaby requested a review from a team as a code owner July 31, 2025 01:35
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gaby has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c309d46 and 5297464.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/middleware/cors.md (3 hunks)
  • middleware/cors/config.go (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 2025-07-31-01-35-41

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gaby gaby changed the title Fix CORS docs and comment 🧹 chore: Fix CORS docs and comments Jul 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes documentation inconsistencies and clarifies CORS configuration details in the Fiber framework. The changes improve accuracy and readability of the CORS middleware documentation.

  • Clarified that wildcard origins cannot be used with credentials for security
  • Fixed type definition and code example in documentation
  • Improved explanation of Vary header behavior

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
middleware/cors/config.go Updated comment to clarify wildcard origin restriction with credentials
docs/middleware/cors.md Fixed ExposeHeaders type, subdomain example syntax, and Vary header description

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @gaby, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the accuracy and clarity of the CORS middleware documentation and its internal comments. It addresses several inaccuracies related to the ExposeHeaders type, the correct usage of AllowOrigins with credentials, and the precise behavior of the Vary header, while also refining a code example for better understanding.

Highlights

  • Documentation Accuracy: Corrected the documented type for ExposeHeaders in the CORS configuration table from string to []string to accurately reflect its usage as a slice of strings.
  • Code Example Clarity: Updated the AllowOrigins code example for subdomain matching to correctly use a string slice ([]string) instead of a single string, aligning with the expected configuration.
  • CORS Behavior Clarification: Enhanced the explanation of the Vary header's role in CORS, detailing its behavior for both simple and preflight requests to improve caching understanding and accuracy.
  • Security Comment Refinement: Clarified the internal comment for AllowCredentials in config.go to explicitly state that the wildcard origin ("*") cannot be used with credentials, rather than implying AllowOrigins itself cannot be true.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gaby gaby added this to v3 Jul 31, 2025
@gaby gaby added this to the v3 milestone Jul 31, 2025
@gaby
Copy link
Member Author

gaby commented Jul 31, 2025

@sixcolors same with this one, just some small inconsistencies

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request provides several documentation and comment fixes for the CORS middleware. The changes clarify the use of wildcards with credentials, correct the type for ExposeHeaders in the documentation, update an example to use a slice for AllowOrigins, and improve the description of the Vary header. The changes are generally good and improve clarity. I've pointed out one minor inaccuracy in the updated Vary header description for further improvement.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.82%. Comparing base (c309d46) to head (5297464).
⚠️ Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3637   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.82%   91.82%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines       11426    11426           
=======================================
  Hits        10492    10492           
  Misses        671      671           
  Partials      263      263           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.82% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@sixcolors sixcolors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 28eabcb into main Aug 1, 2025
15 checks passed
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 deleted the 2025-07-31-01-35-41 branch August 1, 2025 14:55
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in v3 Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants