Skip to content

Conversation

yutannihilation
Copy link
Contributor

@yutannihilation yutannihilation commented May 30, 2025

Fix #591

I believe this is a simple mistake around the indices. I still haven't succeeded to build duckdb-spatial locally, so all I can do is to rely on CI... (edit: I confirmed the test passes on my local)

@yutannihilation
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should I have created pull requests against v1.3.0 branch instead of main? It seems all checks are failing...

@Maxxen
Copy link
Member

Maxxen commented Jun 1, 2025

Hello! Thanks a lot for the PR! Looks great!

The branch configuration is a bit confusing... generally we do most development on the branch corresponding to the latest stable duckdb version (v1.3.0) which has the DuckDB version in the CI and submodule "pinned". Whatever gets built by CI on this branch also becomes available for users by installing from the 'core_nightly' repository, e.g. FORCE INSTALL spatial FROM core_nightly. Although, sometimes new features in spatial are dependent on yet-to-be-released DuckDB changes, in which case we merge them into main. However, when we are getting close to a new release, we merge the latest stable branch into main and start to shift development to the main branch, to consolidate the changes thats happened both in DuckDB core and spatial so far and make sure spatial is in a good state for the next DuckDB release.

@Maxxen Maxxen changed the base branch from main to v1.3.0 June 1, 2025 10:52
@yutannihilation
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the detailed explanation! I got it. Since my branches are still based on main, the CI probably will keep failing. I will merge the latest v1.3.0 branch.

@Maxxen
Copy link
Member

Maxxen commented Jun 1, 2025

No problem! The windows mingw CI still fails randomly sometime due to a vcpkg openssl issue, but dont worry about that!

@Maxxen Maxxen merged commit 0bbe0b8 into duckdb:v1.3.0 Jun 2, 2025
22 checks passed
@yutannihilation yutannihilation deleted the fix/st_affine branch June 2, 2025 09:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ST_Affine() doesn't handle 3D transformation correctly
2 participants