Repackage azure-devops-extensions-api to fix Azure DevOps report plugin #6299
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
...ion.Reporting/TypeScript/azure-devops-report/src/azure-devops-extension-api/Common/Client.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...g/TypeScript/azure-devops-report/src/azure-devops-extension-api/Common/Util/Serialization.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
shyamnamboodiripad
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2025
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #6242
The
azure-devops-extensions-apipackage uses AMD packaging which modern web frameworks do not support well (or sometimes at all). This was causing issues with the SDK being loaded multiple times into the page, confusing the REST api client. This PR updates the packaging to use only ES modules. Sinceazure-devops-extensions-apidoes not support ES modules, this PR includes a pruned version of the package with only the parts we need.This will greatly simplify packaging and make it more reliable. Tthe old solution was using a babel converter to get around the problem, which in the end only made things worse.
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow