Skip to content

Add "features limited or restricted by licensing" anti-feature marker #623

@anonhostpi

Description

@anonhostpi

On this particular thread, it was mentioned that there may be a need to provide a disclaimer or flag for certain projects that have not-so-obvious caveats:

I don't really mind, especially SAML... 😭 but I think we should add an anti-feature warning similar to https://awesome-selfhosted.net/ (Security features exclusive to non-free tier or something close)

I think a more appropriate option would be Security features limited or restricted by licensing. This would prevent contributors from trying to circumvent the flag through usage of legal verbage.

I am moving the conversation here.

I think adding [xxxxx] features limited or restricted by licensing flags and other disclaimers would be a valuable disclosure for people considering certain projects.

This was driven by a conversation about https://sso.tax applicability to certain projects listed here.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions