fix(spec): Suggest Unique Identifier fields to be UUID #405
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @a2a-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request updates the src/a2a/types.py file to align with a new specification, primarily by enhancing the clarity of documentation for various identifier fields. The changes specify that many id fields are expected to be UUIDs and refine the terminology used for these identifiers.
Highlights
- ID Field Clarification: Clarified that "id" fields in DeleteTaskPushNotificationConfigParams, GetTaskPushNotificationConfigParams, ListTaskPushNotificationConfigParams, TaskIdParams, and TaskQueryParams are unique identifiers, often UUIDs.
- Push Notification Configuration: Updated the description for "id" in PushNotificationConfig to specify it's a unique identifier (e.g., UUID).
- Task Push Notification Configuration: Modified the "task_id" description in TaskPushNotificationConfig to indicate it's a unique identifier (e.g., UUID).
- Artifact Identification: Added clarification that "artifact_id" in Artifact is a unique identifier (e.g., UUID).
- Message Context ID: Refined the description for "context_id" in Message from "context identifier" to "context ID".
- Message Task ID: Changed the description for "task_id" in Message from "identifier of the task" to "ID of the task".
- Task Class Identifiers: Updated "context_id" and "id" descriptions in the Task class to explicitly mention "unique identifier (e.g. UUID)".
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the documentation for various identifier fields across the data models to improve clarity and consistency, primarily by adding (e.g. UUID) to specify the expected format. The changes are generally good and enhance the specification.
I've pointed out two places where the changes seem to introduce inconsistencies contrary to the goal of the PR. My suggestions aim to align these docstrings with the more descriptive style used in the rest of the changes.
holtskinner
changed the title
…f3d4136ed1b5751f6e
holtskinner
deleted the
auto-update-a2a-types-00cf76e7bbc752842ef254f3d4136ed1b5751f6e
branch
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.3.2](v0.3.1...v0.3.2) (2025-08-20) ### Bug Fixes * Add missing mime_type and name in proto conversion utils ([#408](#408)) ([72b2ee7](72b2ee7)) * Add name field to FilePart protobuf message ([#403](#403)) ([1dbe33d](1dbe33d)) * Client hangs when implementing `AgentExecutor` and `await`ing twice in execute method ([#379](#379)) ([c147a83](c147a83)) * **grpc:** Update `CreateTaskPushNotificationConfig` endpoint to `/v1/{parent=tasks/*/pushNotificationConfigs}` ([#415](#415)) ([73dddc3](73dddc3)) * make `event_consumer` tolerant to closed queues on py3.13 ([#407](#407)) ([a371461](a371461)) * non-blocking `send_message` server handler not invoke push notification ([#394](#394)) ([db82a65](db82a65)) * **proto:** Add `icon_url` to `a2a.proto` ([#416](#416)) ([00703e3](00703e3)) * **spec:** Suggest Unique Identifier fields to be UUID ([#405](#405)) ([da14cea](da14cea)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Commit: a2aproject/A2A@00cf76e