Skip to content

Conversation

weimch
Copy link
Contributor

@weimch weimch commented Aug 11, 2025

  • Problem: When client use send_message with MessageSendConfiguration.blocking=False, the result_aggregator will enter the logic of _continue_consuming. But it's not push notification to client. The client can't get notification for long-running task(non-blocking invoke) at this situation.
  • Solution: Simply add push notification logic to result_aggregator is okay.

Fixes #239 🦕

@weimch weimch requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2025 11:36
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @weimch, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've addressed a bug where non-blocking send_message calls were failing to trigger push notifications, leaving clients without updates on long-running tasks. My fix integrates push notification logic directly into the ResultAggregator to ensure clients receive timely updates for all message sending configurations.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix - Non-blocking Notifications: Previously, when send_message was used with blocking=False, the system would not send push notifications, preventing clients from receiving updates on long-running tasks.
  • Enhanced ResultAggregator: I've updated the ResultAggregator to accept an optional PushNotificationSender instance. This allows it to actively send notifications during the _continue_consuming process.
  • Integration in default_request_handler: The _setup_message_execution function now correctly passes the _push_sender to the ResultAggregator when it's initialized, enabling the new notification functionality for non-blocking flows.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses an issue where non-blocking send_message calls failed to trigger push notifications. The solution involves extending ResultAggregator to handle push notifications during background event processing, which is a logical and effective approach. The implementation is sound. I have one suggestion regarding code duplication that was introduced, which could be addressed to improve long-term maintainability.

@weimch weimch changed the title fix: non-blocking send_message server handler not invoke push notific… fix: non-blocking send_message server handler not invoke push notification Aug 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@holtskinner holtskinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a unit test for the issue that you are fixing?

@weimch
Copy link
Contributor Author

weimch commented Aug 12, 2025

Can you add a unit test for the issue that you are fixing?

Sure, after the changes are approved, i will add a unit test.

@holtskinner
Copy link
Member

Can you add a unit test for the issue that you are fixing?

Sure, after the changes are approved, i will add a unit test.

Please add the unit tests before this is merged

@weimch weimch force-pushed the bugfix/notify_not_push branch 2 times, most recently from 679ecc8 to 5824806 Compare August 13, 2025 08:23
@weimch
Copy link
Contributor Author

weimch commented Aug 13, 2025

Can you add a unit test for the issue that you are fixing?

Sure, after the changes are approved, i will add a unit test.

Please add the unit tests before this is merged

Certainly, but the test_default_request_handler.py is too complex for me. I need time to fully understand how to write. The unit tests will be late(maybe tomorrow).

On the ohter hand, i have add a callbck to solve the duplication issue mentioned by gemini-code-assist. You can check it.

Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the update, @weimch!

I appreciate you addressing the duplication issue with the new callback mechanism. The changes in src/a2a/server/request_handlers/default_request_handler.py and src/a2a/server/tasks/result_aggregator.py look like a good approach to centralize the push notification logic.

Regarding the unit tests for test_default_request_handler.py, I understand that some parts of the codebase can be complex and require time to fully grasp. It's important to have robust tests, especially for critical paths, so please take the necessary time to ensure they are well-written and cover the new functionality and any relevant edge cases. I look forward to seeing them when they are ready.

@weimch weimch force-pushed the bugfix/notify_not_push branch from 5824806 to 6a91e23 Compare August 13, 2025 08:29
@weimch
Copy link
Contributor Author

weimch commented Aug 18, 2025

The unit test is added at test_default_request_handler.py. Hope changes can be merged.

image

…ation

- Problem: When client use send_message with MessageSendConfiguration.blocking=False, the result_aggregator will enter the logic of _continue_consuming. But it's not push notification to client. The client can't get notification for long-running task(non-blocking invoke) at this situation.
- Solution: Add callbck to support push notification when doing continue_consuming.
@weimch weimch force-pushed the bugfix/notify_not_push branch from b0909a3 to 90cb294 Compare August 18, 2025 07:18
@holtskinner holtskinner changed the title fix: non-blocking send_message server handler not invoke push notification fix: non-blocking send_message server handler not invoke push notification Aug 20, 2025
@holtskinner holtskinner merged commit db82a65 into a2aproject:main Aug 20, 2025
8 checks passed
holtskinner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.3.2](v0.3.1...v0.3.2)
(2025-08-20)


### Bug Fixes

* Add missing mime_type and name in proto conversion utils
([#408](#408))
([72b2ee7](72b2ee7))
* Add name field to FilePart protobuf message
([#403](#403))
([1dbe33d](1dbe33d))
* Client hangs when implementing `AgentExecutor` and `await`ing twice in
execute method
([#379](#379))
([c147a83](c147a83))
* **grpc:** Update `CreateTaskPushNotificationConfig` endpoint to
`/v1/{parent=tasks/*/pushNotificationConfigs}`
([#415](#415))
([73dddc3](73dddc3))
* make `event_consumer` tolerant to closed queues on py3.13
([#407](#407))
([a371461](a371461))
* non-blocking `send_message` server handler not invoke push
notification
([#394](#394))
([db82a65](db82a65))
* **proto:** Add `icon_url` to `a2a.proto`
([#416](#416))
([00703e3](00703e3))
* **spec:** Suggest Unique Identifier fields to be UUID
([#405](#405))
([da14cea](da14cea))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feat]: Non blocking with intermediary responses (via push notification)
5 participants