Skip to content

Conversation

jrafanie
Copy link
Member

@jrafanie jrafanie commented Nov 8, 2024

miq-bot pushed a commit to ManageIQ/manageiq-cross_repo-tests that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
@jrafanie
Copy link
Member Author

jrafanie commented Nov 8, 2024

ok, cross repo: ManageIQ/manageiq-cross_repo-tests#928 is green other than an issue requiring qpid_proton in nuage and openstack:

    1) OpenstackStfEventMonitor connecting to STF service URL prepare QDR endpoint
       Failure/Error: require 'qpid_proton'
  
       ArgumentError:
         wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0)
       # ./spec/legacy/events/openstack_stf_event_monitor_spec.rb:5:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

...  

https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/actions/runs/11749197033/job/32736846677?pr=928

    1) ManageIQ::Providers::Nuage::NetworkManager::EventCatcher::Runner .event_monitor_handle
       Failure/Error: require 'qpid_proton'
  
       ArgumentError:
         wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0)
       # ./app/models/manageiq/providers/nuage/network_manager/event_catcher/stream.rb:25:in `initialize'
       # ./app/models/manageiq/providers/nuage/network_manager/event_catcher/runner.rb:7:in `new'
       # ./app/models/manageiq/providers/nuage/network_manager/event_catcher/runner.rb:7:in `event_monitor_handle'
       # ./spec/models/manageiq/providers/nuage/network_manager/event_catcher/runner_spec.rb:12:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'

https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/actions/runs/11749197033/job/32736846113?pr=928

@agrare Have you seen this before?

@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the fix-uri-1-0-1-warnings branch from e4e6169 to b1a2248 Compare November 11, 2024 14:48
@kbrock
Copy link
Member

kbrock commented Nov 11, 2024

Looks like legit issues with nuage, openstack: number of args to constructor

@jrafanie
Copy link
Member Author

Looks like legit issues with nuage, openstack: number of args to constructor

yeah, thanks, I was meaning to look at those again today

@jrafanie jrafanie added the wip label Nov 11, 2024
@jrafanie
Copy link
Member Author

jrafanie commented Nov 11, 2024

Looks like legit issues with nuage, openstack: number of args to constructor

I wonder if the warnings about uri 1.0.1 are an indicator it's related to 1.0.1

  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:32: warning: already initialized constant URI::AMQP::DEFAULT_PORT
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:32: warning: previous definition of DEFAULT_PORT was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: already initialized constant URI::Schemes::AMQP
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: previous definition of AMQP was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:41: warning: already initialized constant URI::AMQPS::DEFAULT_PORT
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:41: warning: previous definition of DEFAULT_PORT was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: already initialized constant URI::Schemes::AMQPS
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: previous definition of AMQPS was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:32: warning: already initialized constant URI::AMQP::DEFAULT_PORT
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:32: warning: previous definition of DEFAULT_PORT was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: already initialized constant URI::Schemes::AMQP
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: previous definition of AMQP was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:41: warning: already initialized constant URI::AMQPS::DEFAULT_PORT
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:41: warning: previous definition of DEFAULT_PORT was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: already initialized constant URI::Schemes::AMQPS
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: previous definition of AMQPS was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:32: warning: already initialized constant URI::AMQP::DEFAULT_PORT
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:32: warning: previous definition of DEFAULT_PORT was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: already initialized constant URI::Schemes::AMQP
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: previous definition of AMQP was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:41: warning: already initialized constant URI::AMQPS::DEFAULT_PORT
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/qpid_proton-0.37.0/lib/core/uri.rb:41: warning: previous definition of DEFAULT_PORT was here
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: already initialized constant URI::Schemes::AMQPS
  /home/runner/work/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/manageiq-cross_repo-tests/repos/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-nuage@3c618859dc3655db13b3a59ae6ab1a41d237162b/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.0.0/gems/uri-1.0.1/lib/uri/common.rb:108: warning: previous definition of AMQPS was here

@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the fix-uri-1-0-1-warnings branch from b1a2248 to 8b65989 Compare November 20, 2024 20:11
@jrafanie jrafanie closed this Dec 10, 2024
@jrafanie jrafanie reopened this Dec 10, 2024
@Fryguy Fryguy self-assigned this Dec 10, 2024
@Fryguy
Copy link
Member

Fryguy commented Dec 10, 2024

@jrafanie What is the impetus to upgrade to 1.0? (I noticed that the default gem in Ruby 3.3.6 is 0.13, and in Ruby 3.4.0 preview, it's also 0.13)

@jrafanie
Copy link
Member Author

@jrafanie What is the impetus to upgrade to 1.0? (I noticed that the default gem in Ruby 3.3.6 is 0.13, and in Ruby 3.4.0 preview, it's also 0.13)

We didn't previously have a version constraint on it and upgrading to 1.0 broke developers locally. There isn't a real backward compatible way to make pre-1.0 changes work without warnings in 1.0 so I was going to upgrade after backports were dying down.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Mar 5, 2025

This pull request is not mergeable. Please rebase and repush.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jun 9, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If these changes are still valid, please remove the stale label, make any changes requested by reviewers (if any), and ensure that this issue is being looked at by the assigned/reviewer(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants