Skip to content

Conversation

mckramer
Copy link
Contributor

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.633% when pulling 36f8667 on mckramer:node-versions into f8a4d69 on Leonidas-from-XIV:master.

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.633% when pulling 36f8667 on mckramer:node-versions into f8a4d69 on Leonidas-from-XIV:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 12, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.633% when pulling 36f8667 on mckramer:node-versions into f8a4d69 on Leonidas-from-XIV:master.

@Leonidas-from-XIV Leonidas-from-XIV merged commit e8540dc into Leonidas-from-XIV:master Mar 12, 2018
@Leonidas-from-XIV
Copy link
Owner

I was thinking about this as well, there is probably little point in supporting on very, very old Node versions and forks thereof and with a decent support policy by the Node folks I am happy to just test supported LTS releases + current release. Thanks for contributing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants