This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 15, 2025. It is now read-only.
Add MseeP.ai badge #44
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi there,
This pull request shares a security update on mcp-task-orchestrator.
We also have an entry for mcp-task-orchestrator in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.
We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of mcp-task-orchestrator.
You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/echoingvesper-mcp-task-orchestrator.
Yours Sincerely,
Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust
Here are our latest evaluation results of mcp-task-orchestrator
Security Scan Results
Security Score: 55/100
Risk Level: high
Scan Date: 2025-07-08
Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices
Security Findings
Medium Severity Issues
semgrep: Use of exec() detected. This can be dangerous if used with untrusted input.
semgrep: Use of subprocess with shell=True detected. This can be dangerous if used with untrusted input.
... and 11 more medium severity issues
This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.