Skip to content

Conversation

diogokiss
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is a dependency to DataDog/integrations-core#1267.

What does this PR do?

It adds a constant to AgentCheck class called MAINTENANCE.

Motivation

This PR is a dependency to DataDog/integrations-core#1267.

Testing Guidelines

An overview on testing
is available in our contribution guidelines.

Additional Notes

This PR is a dependency to DataDog/integrations-core#1267.

diogokiss pushed a commit to diogokiss/integrations-core that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported
as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to
determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned
intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to
Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496).
I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent
version 5.8.0.

This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
diogokiss pushed a commit to diogokiss/integrations-core that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported
as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to
determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned
intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to
Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496).
I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent
version 5.8.0.

This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
diogokiss pushed a commit to diogokiss/integrations-core that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported
as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to
determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned
intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to
Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496).
I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent
version 5.8.0.

This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
diogokiss pushed a commit to diogokiss/integrations-core that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported
as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to
determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned
intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to
Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496).
I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent
version 5.8.0.

This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
diogokiss pushed a commit to diogokiss/integrations-core that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2018
Currently, if a node in Consul is set into maintenance state, it is reported
as a node in critical state to Datadog metrics. This makes it confusing to
determine by the metric whether it is a node failing with problems or an planned
intervention. A user made a PR to Datadog some time ago, but it was not merged due to
Datadog code organization changes and got forgotten (DataDog/dd-agent#2496).
I'm pushing the change forward. I've tested it using dd-agent
version 5.8.0.

This PR also depends on DataDog/dd-agent#3708
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant