"Member name" filter in Members list

[nunoeufrasio]

Describe the problem

Currently, the only way to look for a member (Members list) is via search input. That does not provide enough flexibility if we think of use cases like finding duplicates/similar member names, or making use of filter operators (contains, does not contain, etc.)

Describe the improvement

Add a new text-based filter - Member name - to Members list. Position in filters list: 1st

Additional context

No response

[peoray]

Can I be assigned to this?

[joanagmaia]

Can I be assigned to this?

Yes of course 😄 Let me know if you need any help on this!

[peoray]

@joanagmaia @nunoeufrasio using the STRING option for filters, I can't find any way to have the include checkbox. can you help?

[joanagmaia]

Hey @peoray.
The include checkbox should be configurable. Let me check the code, and I'll get back to you as soon as possible

[joanagmaia]

Hey @peoray,
I just aligned with our product designer @nunoeufrasio, and there's no need to include the "Include" toggle for now on this filter. We are not adding this checkbox for string filters, so we want to keep it consistent for now. No need to add it on your side; sorry for the confusion.

One small detail, on this line https://github.com/CrowdDotDev/crowd.dev/pull/1427/files#diff-ad93c3671a203d1c70a3ef431a8caf74c92994f8b8acd40f4950efd338ab22c9R27 of the PR you have associated, you should have:

return apiFilterRendererByType[FilterConfigType.STRING]('displayName', value);

instead of memberName. This key is the one that needs to match the API, and for members the name property is being read/updated in the displayName field. Once you have updated this, feel free to add me as a reviewer so that I can take a final look.

Ps. For future reference though, if you would wish to add this checkbox, you would need to add CrFilterIncludeSwitch component to the type of filter you want, such as StringFilter.vue. You can check the approach on one of the other filters such as MultiSelectFilter.

[peoray]

Thanks for the detailed response again :)