-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
#590: Process local adapter manifests before internal manifests #591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#590: Process local adapter manifests before internal manifests #591
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good, nice and simple solution imo. I think you can click commit suggestion
on some of the notes and the lint should pass. You can also run the linter locally with make lint
.
Thanks @JoshBurnell!
|
||
# set where to find the new manifest | ||
os.environ['OTIO_PLUGIN_MANIFEST_PATH'] = otio_path.name | ||
result = otio.plugins.manifest.load_manifest() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This unit test is great. But a note to self is that it might be nice to have a way to at run time add manifests on the path rather than doing it by manipulating the environment variable and calling load_manifest()
.
It looks like there is a conflict in manifest.py. Can you rebase on top of the latest master to resolve the conflict? Sorry about that. I suspect that is also why the unit test suite hasn't been run on this. |
Resolved. |
Or maybe not... hang on. |
There we go. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #591 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 81.67% 81.67%
=======================================
Files 72 72
Lines 2729 2729
=======================================
Hits 2229 2229
Misses 500 500
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Great catch @JoshBurnell, thanks for fixing this! |
Reordered the processing of adapter manifests. Also fixed bug in Manifest.extend() which missed hook types if they weren't included at Manifest creation.