Skip to content

Conversation

JoshBurnell
Copy link
Contributor

Reordered the processing of adapter manifests. Also fixed bug in Manifest.extend() which missed hook types if they weren't included at Manifest creation.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jminor jminor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ssteinbach ssteinbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, nice and simple solution imo. I think you can click commit suggestion on some of the notes and the lint should pass. You can also run the linter locally with make lint.

Thanks @JoshBurnell!


# set where to find the new manifest
os.environ['OTIO_PLUGIN_MANIFEST_PATH'] = otio_path.name
result = otio.plugins.manifest.load_manifest()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This unit test is great. But a note to self is that it might be nice to have a way to at run time add manifests on the path rather than doing it by manipulating the environment variable and calling load_manifest().

@JoshBurnell JoshBurnell requested a review from ssteinbach October 2, 2019 17:53
@ssteinbach ssteinbach added this to the Public Beta 12 milestone Oct 2, 2019
@ssteinbach
Copy link
Collaborator

It looks like there is a conflict in manifest.py. Can you rebase on top of the latest master to resolve the conflict? Sorry about that. I suspect that is also why the unit test suite hasn't been run on this.

@JoshBurnell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Resolved.

@JoshBurnell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Or maybe not... hang on.

@JoshBurnell
Copy link
Contributor Author

There we go.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 3, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #591 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #591   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.67%   81.67%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        2729     2729           
=======================================
  Hits         2229     2229           
  Misses        500      500
Flag Coverage Δ
#py27 81.65% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#py36 81.65% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#py37 81.65% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 977b65b...613889c. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ssteinbach ssteinbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ssteinbach ssteinbach merged commit 44a0c44 into AcademySoftwareFoundation:master Oct 3, 2019
@ssteinbach
Copy link
Collaborator

Great catch @JoshBurnell, thanks for fixing this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants