the -> an

Author: Enegg

peps/pep-0767.rst

@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ This has a few subtyping implications. Borrowing from :pep:`705#inheritance`:
     has_name = NamedDescriptor()
 
   Type checkers should not assume that access to a protocol's read-only attributes
-  is supported by the protocol's type (``type[HasName]``). Even if the attribute
+  is supported by the protocol's type (``type[HasName]``). Even if an attribute
   exists on the protocol's type, no assumptions should be made about its type.
 
   Accurately modeling the behavior and type of ``type[HasName].name`` is difficult,