Skip to content

Conversation

stainless-app[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@stainless-app stainless-app bot commented Mar 5, 2025

chore(internal): move HttpRequestBodies file
chore(internal): extract function for checking for lists in json fields

Migration

  1. Builder methods that used to take contentType and filename as positional parameters after the main argument now no longer do. To set a custom contentType or filename, pass MultipartField, which can be constructed via MultipartField.builder().
  2. It's unlikely you were referencing it, but MultipartFormValue is now called MultipartField if you were.

chore(internal): move `HttpRequestBodies` file
chore(internal): extract function for checking for lists in json fields

# Migration

1. Builder methods that used to take `contentType` and `filename` as positional parameters after the main argument now no longer do. To set a custom `contentType` or `filename`, pass `MultipartField`, which can be constructed via `MultipartField.builder()`.
2. It's unlikely you were referencing it, but `MultipartFormValue` is now called `MultipartField` if you were.
@stainless-app stainless-app bot merged commit 97fc7e9 into generated Mar 5, 2025
@stainless-app stainless-app bot deleted the chore-client-refactor-multipart- branch March 5, 2025 09:20
stainless-app bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2025
chore(internal): move `HttpRequestBodies` file
chore(internal): extract function for checking for lists in json fields
# Migration
1. Builder methods that used to take `contentType` and `filename` as positional parameters after the main argument now no longer do. To set a custom `contentType` or `filename`, pass `MultipartField`, which can be constructed via `MultipartField.builder()`.
2. It's unlikely you were referencing it, but `MultipartFormValue` is now called `MultipartField` if you were.
@stainless-app stainless-app bot mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants